![]() Additionally, set a max price for your search and save the alert to be notified in real-time when "cheaper" apartments come on the market. When searching on HotPads for more affordable apartments, use the "Sort:" feature next to the "Get alerts" button to sort apartments by Lowest Price for Santa Cruz County. How to search for Cheap Apartments in Santa Cruz County, CA? Some areas will be cheaper than others and based on demand, rent will fluctuate. These more affordable apartments are also relative to the other apartment inventory within Santa Cruz County. Although a property might be found within the "Cheap Apartments" search, does not mean it is a low-quality rental. What does "Cheap" mean for Apartment rentals in Santa Cruz County, CA?Ĭheap is a relative term to communicate more "affordable" rental and living expenses. There are 153 cheaper apartment units available for rent. And if a bond measure is not tailored to supporting citizen-sponsored housing and undertaking the necessary governmental reforms to encourage and support that, then the bond itself is probably not worth our support.Santa Cruz County Snapshot Frequently asked questions How many cheaper, more affordable apartments are available in Santa Cruz County, CA? Grass-roots housing is by far the cheapest, the most inclusive and democratic of all housing. No developer, not even “nonprofits” with both their hands deep in the public trough, can compete with that for economy, efficiency and scale. And the silver lining of a housing shortage is that many residential property owners now have enough equity to fund construction on their properties for their children, parents, friends, co-workers and neighbors. If the will were there, zoning approvals and building permits could be, as they once were, over-the-counter or even free, paid for through that bond. The infrastructure is already there and, given technological improvements in energy and water conservation, it’s mostly adequate to the task. There is much free land available in the city for housing. I looked for the logic in that and found none. Every day, new hurdles are manufactured to make housing more expensive and more difficult.Īnd now the mayor wants to make home ownership a bit more expensive by pushing a property tax that would perpetuate this entropic treadmill while ignoring all these very real factors. Don’t let all the high-and-mighty talk about “safety” and “green” fool you. Using over-wrought codes nitpicked by over-bearing, third-party contractors happy to over-compensate for their own lack of hands-on construction knowledge, building departments have become a detached and redundant money pit in the war against efficient housing. Those up-front, out-of-pocket expenses, paid out on faith before the project can even qualify for a construction loan, discourage a lot of people from even trying.Īnd then there’s building permits. It often costs more to get through the planning process, and its trumped-up “impact” fees, than to complete all the technical drawings for a building permit. Third, getting zoning approval may sound like a simple formality, but you’d be surprised what a money pit it can be. If it’s already there in our existing neighborhoods, who needs sprawl? If the roads, sewer, water, gas and power lines are already in place, you’ve got a huge leg up. Our village could have done that on its own, but sometimes it takes a state. Free is the best by far, and with the enactment of new state legislation, every residential lot in the city now has free land on which to build one, two or three new dwellings. The cheaper the land, the cheaper the housing. Land costs can amount to a third of a new home’s sticker price. No one asks those questions anymore, but let’s walk through them now. We’d probably start by figuring out how to get the biggest bang for our buck – housing the most people at the least cost. We’ve come to take pride in the very tokenism we once marched against, housing a select few at someone else’s expense, denying the many and then patting ourselves on the back for striking a blow against capitalism.īut what if we stopped passing the buck and, as citizens of this city, took responsibility for housing ourselves, just as we once did. It’s what we distract ourselves with to justify denying people the adequate shelter they need and deserve. At a million dollars a “unit,” all told, that term is an oxymoron at best, a pretext at worst.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |